Europe in the Dark: Cyber-attack Suspicions, Meta’s New AI, Qwen 3 & Earths rotation changes
Another episode of Cloud Unplugged.
We've got some good news stories.
Obviously, always things going on.
got the big super mega power
outage in portugal spain
and I think france as well
um was it cyber attack was
it not it wasn't apparently
it was a meteorological
thing maybe kind of but
maybe was cyber um no I'm
really admitting we've got
meta's standalone um ip app
launch so they've now done
their meta ai um ai system
which we'll talk about and
then we've got alibaba
And the new AI model, Qen three,
which we'll also talk about.
But I say we, probably mostly you.
And then a little bit
tangentially on just normal
things around the Amazon tariff.
Should we be showing the
extra cost to everybody?
But maybe not,
because Trump slapped their
wrists and said, absolutely don't.
But yeah, let's get into it, I guess,
Lewis.
The power outage.
What do you reckon?
Cyber or no cyber?
Well, it's interesting.
Nothing has been ruled out at this time,
I think is the most PC or
most accurate way of putting it.
But
It's just fascinating what
has been said about,
and it was interesting you
brought up a meteorological effect.
The equivalent of the Met
Office in Spain have ruled
that out as a possible culprit.
And there's a lot of social
media talking about an
anomaly causing the event.
And there's a lot of
engineering discourse
talking about solar
inverters and how they can
react instantaneously to grid events.
So at this time... Solar inverters?
What are solar inverters?
So inverters are something
that takes DC power
and make it AC by inverting
the signal to make it
suitable for transmission on the grid.
Now,
the thing with many other renewables
or otherwise,
there's a lead time for
getting new generation onto the grid.
um with wind you've got
massive turbine blades that
need to spin up and start
running the generator and
they need to turn into the
wind or be blown into the
wind but with solar it's
solid state it can all be
instantaneous and normally
they take the signal of
what they can add to the
grid or take away from the
grid by reading the grid
itself directly so there's
has taught that a highly
interconnected grid with
very similar dynamics for
how power is controlled
across a massive industry will lead to a
potential cause but as I
said that's just another
percentile and it seems
like surely this would be a
particular make or few
makes of solar um inverter
and connectivity grid
infrastructure etc etc and
there'll be many fail-safes
between that component and
a wider grid so yeah we're
all left guessing
no one knows really I guess
now I think I think what I
saw was that um they the
spanish government
basically said that the
power companies have a
deadline I believe today
this afternoon it's meant
to be this afternoon and I
was browsing and looking at
social media just before I
came on and nothing yeah no
nothing in the news but
they probably have provided
to the government I imagine
and they're probably governments
looking at it and then
there'll be pr around it
because I guess it depends
on what actually comes back
and whether they're allowed
to even tell you the truth
or not or whether we all
just forget and move on and
no one ever knows um indeed
I I tried to dig into the
cyber side of things and a
possible attack um
just because it's not unprecedented.
It's happened before.
You know,
Ukraine obviously is a high target,
but India and US have also
reported incidents in the past.
And we have seen lots of critical,
or at least large parts of
national infrastructure affected before,
even in the UK of the NHS and
So it just seems to me my
food judgment would be... Cyber.
Well,
a coordinated attack seems like
almost as audacious to be
able to affect so much of
such large portions of countries.
So then it makes you think, well,
there must be some
commonalities regardless.
So therefore,
unless it's a massive
coordinated cyber attack...
And that would be a big state act, maybe.
Yeah, I don't know.
I'm left...
slightly frazzled.
But I guess the interesting
part of the story was
really the knock-on effects
to everyday life,
and even petrol pumps being
affected because they're
electric by power outages.
So phones couldn't be charged.
People couldn't pay for things.
I mean,
I haven't used a credit card or had
one with me for a long time,
and certainly haven't used
cash for a long time.
But I'd be the first one stuck in Spain.
Although it was lovely to
see lots of people partying
in the streets and
generally just thinking, meh.
Back to real normal.
Back to human to human.
Human to human.
No more tech.
No more...
you know,
corner cutting on like tapping
and sticking at your phone
and messaging people and
being all digital communication.
Yeah.
So it was like,
do look up because there's nothing on.
Yeah.
I kind of like that.
I suppose it's probably
quite a refreshing.
Maybe we should do it every so often.
Maybe we should have a blackout.
Blackout days.
Blackout days.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I guess TBD, we'll have to find that out,
I guess.
Yeah,
see what the rest of the world finds out.
But we weighed in.
It wasn't really cloud directly related,
but it felt news and cyber
is a big part of IT security.
And critical national
infrastructure is all
electronic based these days.
So it kind of all leads to that.
But kind of a flip side of that,
if I segue into the next story, maybe.
Well, actually,
I need to give feedback on
because I said I would also
give feedback on agent
space because I couldn't get it working.
And just as feedback,
please improve your error
messages and error handling
Google because it's so poor.
just says source effects
something something
something on the on the uh
llm stuff and then on the
vertex ai stuff the portal
for vertex ai for like the
basically like a the
catalog the app catalog
stuff so you can actually
then create um apps on
require different
permissions and then even
though I had a license as
the actual issue was it
said I had a license
assigned um but I kind of didn't
So what I did was I
unassigned and then
reassigned the license and it worked.
So who knows what happened there?
But anyway,
it just sounds like technology.
Yeah.
So I did manage to get it hooked up.
So I managed to create one of the apps.
um which is the vertex ai
application aspect of it
there's the notebook at the
lem aspect to it too um
which is like more you just
provide documents and
provide things directly but
when you use one of the
apps I've got some default
I think some of them still
in preview um like search
general search media search
got like a healthcare thing
as well um for certain
types of data types
Are these in Vertex Studio
different agents or tools for the agent?
They are agents.
So they are agents.
So the search agent, I think,
I only use the data source.
So you provide the data
source and that could be
lots of different things.
So it could be BigQuery or other stuff.
Mine was just like the drive.
So it wasn't a cloud resource.
It was Google Drive.
What was your agent called?
What was your project of one-liner?
Sell it to me.
Called it, I can't remember.
I was just fiddling around.
So whatever,
just some nonsensical name for me.
I was just testing it out.
The aim of it was for me to
ingest a lot of our Drive documentation
not just drive documentation
but obviously we've got
like customer proposals and
statements of works and
things like that so
obviously I needed to make
sure it was protected so I
needed it regional I didn't
want it to go anywhere I
wanted to make sure the
data is encrypted because
obviously it's got customer
data in it and things like
that not really customer
data but work that we've
done for the customer that
might be classified a
little bit sensitive
nothing really that
sensitive in it but um
But yeah, so then encrypted all of that.
And then I wanted to just
ask questions to see how easy it was.
Like,
can I ask questions on data in the drive?
Like, you know,
when did a project with
customer X end or when we
did this work with this customer,
what actually was the outcome, you know?
And so we'll end up reading
all the information.
So long as you're keeping
track of all of this data,
obviously you need the data.
That's obviously pretty,
it's just gonna make it up.
And also the data does need to be accurate,
as in whatever you've got
in there does have to be good data.
But if you get it right,
it's actually quite good.
So I got it to write a case study for me,
but it literally was more
verbatim of what the
statement of work was.
I haven't added it to our
existing case study drives.
We've got existing case
studies in there for customers.
So I thought that'd be quite
an interesting one.
And then you can also
integrate it into Confluence.
So I was like, well,
actually I could create a
Confluence agent and maybe
there's like other
information in our
Confluence to start to ingest.
And internally it could
become quite useful if you don't,
say you're a new starter in the company,
you don't know that much, you know,
about AppBear and the history.
You've not been privy
to all the customer journey,
then you might want to just
ask questions because you
just don't know.
So you might just go into it
and add questions.
So this allows you to hand
bake an agent with fixed
sources and provide a chat
interface for... It
provides a chat interface.
It is the agent.
It's the search agent that
provides an interface.
You have the option to toggle web UI.
And it will basically create a web UI,
basically front end thing
around the agent for you,
which is just essentially
just a search bar.
And then the results coming
up of the search underneath
that your whatever question you're asking,
whatever search is a little
bit rudimentary.
That type of thing is that
agent was very search driven.
That was the type of agent.
There are other agents like
media agents around like
graphics and images and
other things and videos.
Was there a...
Was there a user interface
to link agents so you can
have agent to agent conversations?
No, but they do have that.
I was looking.
Like a flowchart type of thing.
You can, yeah.
And you can actually add other things.
So some of the...
some of the functionality
within it was like
calendars and gmail and
some of those are in
preview still um and so you
can start to attach
additional things so
actually I think that's I
think that was actually on
the data sources side on
the integration side
there's like integration
and then you can do the
integration so technically
they probably are agents to
be a calendar agent there's
obviously a gmail agent
there's obviously on this
search so you can actually
It will be agent to agent, I imagine,
but I didn't get that far.
I don't know if I trust it
yet to have access to my
email and my calendar and
my drive and everything.
I mean,
they do have access because it is
their services,
but yet another service
indexing into a model.
I guess it's a very interesting journey,
and it's going to be a few...
you know,
bits that we can come back to
throughout the series to see like, ah,
okay, it's not just new user onboarding,
but it's a sales flow when
we ever need to create a
report or case study or
whatever it may be.
And in tech,
you know,
in software development is going
to be a whole bunch.
We're talking about documentation,
like how do we ground it?
How do we use software one
point to have tools that do
concrete things and provide
very exact validation of
things like schemas and
parameters and blah, blah, blah.
and how do we use software
two point O in agent space
to then come up with words
to describe this concretely
or reliably or whatever.
It's fascinating.
Then we'll all use more.
Yeah.
So it was cool.
I kind of liked it.
It solved kind of ish the
problem that I was going to look.
So obviously it's a bit of
just playing around.
So nothing too interesting.
But yes, so agents, talking about AI,
I guess,
because I did need to give an
update on that, and I will keep,
like you're saying,
keep giving an update.
The meta AI, over to you,
because you were looking
into this a little bit more than I have.
I haven't really seen this, but...
Yeah.
Well, interesting.
I was going to do a segue
from the other story
because I started using
Meta AI in WhatsApp and on
WhatsApp web to start
fielding some of the
research and comparing it
against Gemini and other bits and pieces.
So I asked it about the
cause of blackouts and stuff.
And it was okay.
It was okay.
It...
kind of made up um got lost
down a particular trailer
fort as ais do but it's a
llama for a mixture of
experts multimodal model
but fundamentally open
source the version doesn't
know which particular model
is used in whatsapp
He goes, I'm just Lama IV.
Which one?
Are you the Scout?
Are you the Maverick?
Which one are you?
And he couldn't quite answer that.
Sorry, just a quick one.
You're saying WhatsApp.
I know that obviously Meta
bought WhatsApp.
Do you mean that you were
using this in WhatsApp
itself or in the Facebook app?
No, in WhatsApp.
So it's available in Facebook.
I don't have a Facebook
account or an Instagram account,
but I do have WhatsApp.
And WhatsApp is even more
pervasive maybe than Facebook.
um or I don't know about
instagram maybe it's up
there um apparently the
tool meta ai is available
on on on many of the
platform many bits of parts
of their platforms and
tools but it's in whatsapp
And you can have a little
chat and you could forward.
You have to copy and paste
things to it and you could
forward chat you've had
with it to people.
But the context is lost.
It doesn't.
What I really wanted was a simple button,
a way of saying fact check
this nonsense that people
are sharing with me.
That's I think the killer.
Yeah.
People being,
I think I WhatsAppped you today.
I was, I literally was WhatsAppping you.
So I feel you're referring to me.
I don't know.
That's your own sensibilities.
Right.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
It does feel like a killer use case for,
you know,
if you could get past the snide
sort of worry.
John,
have you seen someone about your
paranoid delusions?
Or is it AI fed?
Every message I send to you
gets fact-checked.
I just get an auto-response.
Yes.
You don't even read it.
You don't need to anymore.
I basically have an agent
spam John's specific filter.
I mean, most people it comes direct,
but with you, there's unknown.
They just,
they go through a filter and get
screened.
There's known,
and they generally come from in,
there's known but John.
It's like a, you know, like, you know,
I guess some repellent.
It doesn't,
it doesn't actually kill you or
block you.
So you don't block,
but what you do is you repel
Through the art of the agent
chatting a load of shit
back to the other person to
the point that they just
don't bother messaging you anymore.
It's kind of genius.
Yeah, I like it.
I like where you're going with that.
It's clever.
Yeah, I mean,
it's integration and possibility to,
you know, thwart misinformation.
I think that will become...
Become, you know, make it useful to me.
Maybe give access.
I know lots of people that I
know that are not in tech.
Lots of my wife's friends
are in personal training or
healthcare or whatever.
The first use of an LLM
wasn't ChatGPT and it
wasn't any of the others.
It was Meta.
um into whatsapp because
it's right there it's in
the thing they use every
day so yeah so that that is
interesting but it's also
interesting how good the
model is and llama four and
you would imagine they
would use a fairly sizable model
There's a whole different
variety of the flavours,
incantations of Llamaphore.
And I couldn't find out
which particular model the
one in WhatsApp was.
But I'd imagine they'd want
to fairly put a good foot
forward and sort of
showcase something fairly good.
But it couldn't count
characters in a sentence
back from the end.
So you say,
what's the thirteenth letter in
this sentence with some
typos and stuff in there?
It couldn't do that.
Gemini can, Gott can.
There are the latest sort of
large models can do that sort of stuff.
But this one couldn't.
And then it went for a crazy
arc of reasoning,
sort of just talking absolute nonsense.
And this is great to sort of
see the thinking behind
what an LLM's doing and saying, right,
E minus O minus three minus cent
Is that five?
I don't know.
And then it sort of goes
back and then it comes out
with a number or a letter
that says it's S. Oh, no, no, no,
it's five in its chain of form.
And it says one.
And then it said, did you count spaces?
Because it was just one off
apart from a space.
And it said, yes, I did count the space.
And it said, well,
let me check that again.
And then it comes back and it goes,
was it Q?
It's like there wasn't a Q
in the sentence.
What are you talking about?
And then it goes, well,
how did you come to your answer?
And I did a bit of bash to use rev,
pipe a sentence for our rev
to get a reverse,
and then pipe it for head
and tail to get the characters.
And then pasted the result
back to it and said, I did this.
And it goes, ah,
I should have trusted the algorithm,
was its answer.
So I'm just like,
so now I'm the algorithm.
Is it because I'm wearing a
Skynet t-shirt?
I don't know.
Maybe.
That is so funny.
Though I do relate because
that is sometimes how I
feel when I'm trying to talk to you.
I mean, just in general, you know,
sometimes, you know,
my brain does act like that.
It does go a bit, what one might say,
senile.
I don't know.
There is moments of that that occurs.
But anyway, yeah, I did.
I mean,
totally a little bit related to this.
I can't remember what I was listening to.
Some of them might be a
Proficy Markets podcast.
Going back a while.
They were saying that the
reason Meta wanted to get
into the phone business is
because obviously the
phones will own the AI, right?
So to go into another app to then do AI,
like WhatsApp or Facebook,
is a little bit weird
because you'll have AI on
your phone natively.
So obviously,
that's why they were trying
to like the devices
themselves are the prime in
terms of like market share of AI.
So they've got their work
cut out really meta, you know,
to kind of leverage into
the user behavior like they'll want.
Obviously, they want it.
That's all about, you know,
the TikToks and the
Instagrams and the Facebooks are all.
all around,
the usage and the nature of the usage.
But it'll be a hard thing
because once you've adopted
a certain AI chat
functionality that you're happy with,
and once they start
integrating into the things
that you're saying,
the context and MCP stuff, then yeah,
the probability of you
using another AI to do kind
of a similar-ish thing,
probably unlikely.
So it'll be an interesting
thing over time.
It is.
I think if you provide a
compelling enough set of context, I mean,
the meta AI angle in all
the blurb is it will form a
history of its chats with you.
And remember, you know,
to be able to use that in
the context so it doesn't
need to go from scratch every time.
And if you're using it for
I don't know,
looking up holidays or whatever,
then it will remember where
you've been and what you've done.
Whether that means it's got
privy to all your chats.
Unless you're engaging with
it all the time.
That annoys me, though.
I hate it when...
Netflix or Spotify start to
pretend to homogenise your
behaviour into something
that they can predict.
You're like, well, actually,
I want it something different.
I don't want the same thing.
Play something different to me.
John, you are one of those people.
That's all you do, isn't it?
Yeah, no,
I just want... That's the thing
that actually generally frustrates me,
because I'm like,
I like different things.
I don't know what I want to listen to,
really.
Surprise me, and you're like...
I have a fourteen year old son, Charlie,
and the doom scrolling,
he's very good at not doing that.
But there was a period,
maybe a year or two ago,
where doom scrolling became
a phrase in our family.
And I think we've all got to
catch ourselves at it.
And it is toxic.
And you want to not have
that as an example.
And you want to make sure
that when you engage,
you are the one that's choosing
It might be a bit more work.
Give me the bloody unlearn button.
I'd be like, no, actually, unlearn me,
thanks.
And the idea of YouTube Shorts.
For me, I put things in Watch It Later.
And I find them on a
different feed on X or something.
So I am being fed.
It's just around the house.
We're all being fed.
It's just where it arrives.
We believe we've got agency, but not so.
And what do you think about
Quen three then?
Alibaba, new AI model.
Is this something you've done?
I didn't even know.
I mean,
it obviously makes sense that
they're going to come out with a,
um a new model but I didn't
get that far uh digging
into it um the headline
headlines um alibaba um
creating their next model
and obviously they have a
cloud and large organization
china yeah and their latest
model I mean it just stands
to reason anyone who's got
access to lots of cloud
compute will provide their
own model or enter this
space and with llama
three, four now available.
There's foundation models
that have been pre-trained
as your starting point and
whether you use that to
refine and produce your own
foundation model from
scratch or shortcut it and
go straight to producing a
model that's got some
grounding or some prior knowledge,
some prior foundation.
I don't know,
I guess it's just a highlight
of the speed to which
anyone with enough compute
can enter this market and
how there's no ring fence
from tariffs or other things.
In fact,
there's probably more of a lever
to accelerate development.
if you know things are
constrained so I don't know
I I I just thought it was
it's a good um a good bit
of uh bookmarking about you
know book ending um yeah no
that's good I'll have to
have a look at the the old
Is it Quenthrie?
You do pronounce it Quenthrie, do you?
Quenthrie, indeed.
Yeah,
double-check it in case I was
pronouncing it wrong.
Cool.
I guess the other thing that
was quite interesting is
the use of models and where
they're hosted.
is kind of fascinating.
If you're in meta land,
then you've got access to
meta models built into certain tools.
If you're using some tools,
you can put API keys and
get all the tools.
And then you use SAS-type services.
I mean, I use CURSO a lot.
It's come up before.
And it's got access to a
certain amount of models
built in so it's got access
to gemini and it's got
access to our open iei um
oh three and four models um
gpt model um and anthropic
most importantly because it
seems to be the one that
work but you can put in
your own keys from the
cloud and use the cloud
hosted versions of all the um
all the open ai models for
instance because um you can
use azure and microsoft to
go direct and get per cost
a cost based price rather
than the reseller sas price
so it's all changing super
quickly and yeah they're
moving target isn't it at
the moment it was there was
I was at the amazon summit
today in London and there
was somebody who was telling me,
this is secondhand
information because I
didn't speak to them myself,
that somebody was talking about another,
I don't know if they were a
booth or maybe they were
just at the event where
is a bit of another model
that's a competitor to Anthropic.
But the way they've trained
the model was actually
through not just learning the code,
but actually learning the compilation,
the errors of the code as
it's been written and
actually training it
through usage as opposed to
just training it through
informational aspects of code.
So actually knowing what good code is,
what bad code is.
and therefore is apparently
more effective.
And I think what they also then do is,
They'll then come in with
that model and then
basically support training
on your specific code and your standards.
So if you've got specific
standards you expect and other things,
therefore it will inherit
the standards through an
additional model.
Like you're saying,
you take that model and add
your context into that
model more and train the
model a little bit more.
Then you don't have to have
such specific context.
You've trained the model for
the context instead and
therefore you've now
It kind of like it
simplifies then the usage.
But yeah.
Yeah.
A foundation model, I guess,
is a highly compressed
version of Tinternet is
like relation in the model
and it can power fashion or
give a reflex answer
immediately without any
deep think and without any use of tools.
But then you want that bit
to be super fast,
but with a company or a
specific bit of extra knowledge,
just so it's super fast at
the really important bits
for you that are unique to you.
Yeah,
it's definitely the way things are going.
Cursor made a big announcement as well.
Oh, did they?
Yeah.
They were about, well, no,
it was a pre-announcement.
The developers that I follow
on Cursor have been
answering people saying,
it would be super useful if
it could use my browser.
And I tried it with
automation for the MCP
plugins to use the browser,
and it was fantastic.
But I did that in a sandbox
for a test account.
You mean like a Selenium thing, as in like,
actually, I'm writing some code.
But to find a trustworthy
thing that has access to your browser.
It was tricky.
I didn't manage to bottom
out on the research,
and the LLMs weren't very
useful at doing deep
research to tell me which
ones were trustworthy or had enough stars,
and I guess it's because it's too early.
But Cursor made an announcement.
Well,
one of the Cursor developers said
they're looking to include
full flow development into
browsers as a thing that
they're going to build as a first part.
To be fair, though, I mean, any IDE,
that you are whether whether
you're using ai or not
getting feedback on this
thing contextually whether
it's going into the ai or
not it's just useful in it
so I guess it kind of makes
sense just as a thing um do
you want to hear my
surprise little new little
surprise I think I think
you might like this um
So the Three Gorges Dam in China,
which they're using
obviously for energy production,
I think it does maybe,
I don't know if it's three
or six percent of the energy in China,
basically provides that level.
But it's altering the shape
of the Earth and its
rotation and apparently is causing,
this is what NASA says,
is causing days to be lengthened by,
I don't know, like,
zero point zero three six
milliseconds per day
because of just the change of
the shape.
They did then go on saying
even a car on a road could
impact by some fractional, you know,
very insignificant fraction,
but still a fraction.
They were then saying about
essentially the human
interference through
I guess,
buildings and construction and all
the other things that we're
kind of doing is, you know,
does alter the planet to some degree.
And it's something that they
need to be aware of environmentally.
And, you know,
maybe there needs to be more
assessments done on what
the long-term impact might
be to these things.
I thought you might quite like that.
That was good.
Interesting.
I would love to know the
actual figures and the
paper that NASA obviously wrote.
If you can provide all those
in the podcast notes or to me,
that would be great.
What are you saying?
You're saying this is fake news?
I don't know what's fake news these days.
And we need fact-checking.
Wow, wow, wow, wow, wow.
Not specifically with you, obviously.
I don't even know what you're saying.
Look, if you see some news... John, John,
you know that scene in
Superman when he goes round
the world the wrong way really,
really fast and goes back in time?
Yeah.
That's not a thing.
That's not what the Three
Gorges Dam is doing right now.
Do you mean that's not a thing?
If I was to go round the world really fast,
I'd go back in time.
I saw it in film.
In Superman.
Yeah.
Also,
if I get in a car and I've got a
friend called Doc...
and I get in a car and you
know it goes super fast
through the space-time
continuum I also can go
back in time and that's why
you you you individually
can in a car and that is
the definition of
relativity fine I will find
the source I mean I know
that I know that it was a
sustainability uh I think
sustainability times is
where I was reading it from but um
I will find the NASA source
to see what it said.
The fact that they mentioned
cars and other things,
I'm not really sure how, like,
it obviously said this.
It is obviously NASA,
they're quoting NASA.
So it must have come from them, I presume.
That bit can't be fake.
As to the context of whether it was,
you know, how close, I don't know.
I'll share that with you.
And then others probably,
maybe we can post it
somewhere so people know.
Absolutely.
Cool.
Well, that is it for this episode.
A little bit over the standard time,
but hopefully it was useful for people.
We'll be tuning in obviously next week,
every week,
every Wednesday and publishing
whatever's going on.
Indeed.
A bit more into cloud specifics next week.
Well,
it depends on what happens in the world,
really, doesn't it?
Well, like I said,
I was at the Amazon Summit
and everything was AI.
So it's very hard.
We're not off topic.
Eighty percent of everything
would seem to be AI related.
But, you know,
there are other things going on.
There was some big
investments I noticed being
made by VC companies in the
platform engineering space
around Kubernetes and
infrastructure and AI.
I think thirty eight mil.
given or maybe maybe
something I think they had
thirty eight mil and then
had a hundred and eight mil
on the second round or
something but anyway so we
can talk about that like
investments looks like the
bcs are now getting back
into the game it looks like
um and now starting to
invest again because I
think there's a bit of a
slowdown and all of that so
it looks like it's picking
up but maybe next week we
could talk about that but
who knows who knows what's
going to happen so I don't
know we don't know all right
an AI uprising and Skynet
and the Terminator.
And the Terminator, yeah.
Just as real as the Superman thing.
And I'm going to now start
sending you loads of
messages on WhatsApp and
see what the AI agent
replies back with now.
Now I know it's not you.
So I'll just speak to you all next week.
See you later.
Bye.
Creators and Guests

